This week’s PitPass Radio show had AMA president Rob Dingman scheduled for the 2nd hour. Due to my wretched travel schedule the last few months I missed the live show and haven’t had time to listen to the MP3 yet. I’m interested to hear what Dingman had to say regarding his new vision. I’ll post some thoughts on it once I get a chance to listen.
Professional racing is so named because the racers are professionals – that is, they expect and work to make their living by racing motorcycles. By inference then, racing is approached as a profit-making enterprise by professional racers. This works great in NASCAR, F1, CART, IRL, etc. as all parties have a common understanding and guidepost for judging their progress. Actually, it works pretty well in the stick-and-ball sports too, where team owners, athletes, and fans all understand that the game is the game, but at the end of the day it’s about the money. So the integrity of the game is protected because all parties have a monetary incentive to do so, and that incentive is shared equally and evenly among them. Not to be confused with the money being shared equally. That’s a different thing.
This underlying profit-making motive levels the playing field for all participants. Everyone makes decisions on economic (meaning cost/benefit) parameters and in many cases there is some sort of open-book revenue sharing agreement. Having a common understanding that it’s all about the money makes it easier to compare relative value and get the money split appropriately among the parties. Everything has a market value, with competition and profit setting the boundaries of the playing field. At least that’s how it works most places.
But not at the AMA. As a non-profit the AMA is disconnected from the concept of professional as profit maker. I don’t mean that the AMA’s Director of Competition or various racing officials don’t get the obvious point that racers need to make money. They do. But the AMA’s very structure, as a membership corporation, is anathema to the profit making motive. And this has a profound effect on how the AMA runs its racing programs.
Manufacturers participate in NASCAR, F1, etc. because those organizations offer a marketing outlet they can leverage. NASCAR, F1, etc. have an incentive to build their sport such that it’s a better name recognition opportunity for various manufacturers than the alternatives. Win on Sunday, sell on Monday applies in NASCAR and F1, but no one expects to run out and buy Michael Waltrip’s Toyota or Felipe Masa’s Ferrari.
AMA professional racing is almost diametrically opposed in every way. Yes, AMA professional racing is a lot smaller than auto racing. But we need to honestly ask the question – is the structure of AMA racing the way it is as a response to the small size, or is the small size of AMA racing a result of the structure? Is professional motorcycle racing trapped by a governance model that was designed in the 1920s
If you have a single, successful example of a growing, vibrant, healthy, non-profit professional racing organization in the US (or anywhere else, for that matter) please let me know about it. I’m not aware of any.
Last Friday I got my new Organic air-cushion body armor from RXR Protect North America. RXR got me setup with one to test with the Leatt. The plan is to try the Leatt with both pieces of body armor and see which works best and what I think about each, and then do a little report for the VMX community. We old guys have to watch our bones. Once you get past 40 your bones start to get brittle, even if you have good bone density. Get-offs that you would have walked away from at 35 will put you in a hospital at 45. And that’s no fun. So safety and protection are the name of the game for the happy VMX racer.
Got my RXR Protect Organic chest protector today. Thanks to Chris Favro of RXR Protect North America for fixing me up with a sweet deal so I can test this with the new Leatt Brace. After talking with Chris we determined that the best path forward was to just get one and see how it worked. The RXR is not designed specifically for the Leatt, and some riders have liked it, others not. I promised Chris I’d test them together and share my findings with the VMX community via this website and McCookRacing.com. Unfortunately, it looks like that’s going to be a little ways down the road, as work and travel are making it almost impossible to get any saddle time and it will be hectic until the Holidays. But hopefully I can get in a little riding before then.
Today I ordered some modern protective equipment – a neck brace and a couple of different chest/body armour units to try with it. The neck brace I bought is the Leatt, the new and somewhat controversial HANS-style device invented and patented by South African Dr. Jeff Leatt. For core protection I ordered an EVS Revolution 5 that is designed for the Leatt, and an RXR Protect Organic.
First released about a year ago, the Leatt has gotten a lot of publicity and raised a lot of arguments both for and against its use. Former riders such as David Bailey and Danny Chandler have spoken out strongly in favor of the brace. As far as I know there haven’t been any riders speak out strongly against it, but it certainly hasn’t been adopted by riders everywhere, for a variety of reasons.
The most common argument against the device is the absence of substantial field-level proof that it actually works as claimed. Such arguments are inherent in any new equipment of this type and will be resolved over time – either favoring or discrediting the Leatt. In the meantime there are a number of riders who feel the unknowns about the device make it not worth the cost, inconvenience, or restriction in range of motion.
But for me it seems to be the right choice to try one. From what I read of the riders who use the Leatt it takes a little getting used to but soon fades from your perception as a rider, blending into the background such that you hardly notice it. This has certainly been the case with the Asterisk Cell knee braces I use. Once laced up and seated on the bike they all but disappear from my consciousness. If the Leatt provides even a modicum of protection against Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), and I suspect it provides more than that based on my reading of the design and research papers, while tasking me no more than my knee braces I will be a very happy camper.
But before making this decision I had to resolve a couple of vintage issues in my mind. Vintage racing is fun, and one of the enjoyable aspects of the hobby is reliving the atmosphere and environment from “back in the day.” For me that meant wearing vintage leather Hi-Point boots, an open-face helmet, old hockey-style shoulder pads, and other early-‘70s era gear. That was part of the fun. But the reality is we’re still racing motorcycles, and we still fall off. While I’m a pretty conservative and thoughtful rider – taking care to stay within my limits and keep my head on straight – there are still times in each race where things can go wrong. And I had to ask myself, “What’s more important – having the look and feel of the ‘70s in my outfit, or taking advantage of the vastly improved technology we have today to minimize my chance of serious injury?”
Giving up the vintage look is not a small matter. It’s not the same to be out on the starting gate with a bunch of ‘74 MX bikes and guys in rugby shirts when you’re decked out in the latest techno-garb. But then again, my goal is to keep riding as long and as healthily as possible, not pose for the best pictures. And then there is the “macho” factor – is all that protective gear really necessary? Anyone who’s ever suffered an SCI will tell you yes. Hell yes. Wear the gear. Get the brace, Whatever. Just take as many steps as you reasonably can to prevent SCIs. We all know riding and racing motorcycles is riskier than babysitting, washing the car, or playing basketball. We all know it’s more dangerous than watching football on TV. But that doesn’t mean we blithely accept the idea of debilitating injury. Bumps, bruises, and even the occasional fracture are part of the game – especially as we get older. But we’ve still got to go to work and make a living. Wheelchairs are not part of the long-term plan.
I’m guessing there’s not a single motorcycle-related cervical SCI victim today who wouldn’t go back in time and wear a device like the Leatt – proven or not – if they could do so before their accident. Life with an SCI is miserable. Life with a cervical SCI can be worse than death. So I will try to accommodate the vintage fashion police by keeping my helmet white, my pants and jersey plain and unadorned by modern graphics. I’ll keep most of my specialized protective gear under my clothes. But my boots will be modern and among the best our modern technology can provide. My helmet will be a new full-face model with modern features. And my neck will be surrounded by the best device that modern medical research and development has yet devised.
I can still get hurt. I can still suffer an SCI. Hell, I came really close 10 years ago when I broke three vertebrae in my lower back by rolling a pickup truck at 50 MPH – a far worse injury than I ever suffered on a motorcycle. Nothing is perfect. But I’ll feel better knowing I’ve stacked the odds a little bit in my favor. And I suspect my subconscious will let me ride a little freer, a little looser, have a bit more fun. And that’s what this is all about anyway.